Hazard Preventions

HAZOP

HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study) is a structured, team-based method that systematically analyzes potential hazards and operability issues in a chemical process by considering deviations from design intent.

Hazard Preventions

Bhopal Gas Tragedy – A Classic Example of Safety Neglect

Bhopal is a painful reminder that neglecting safety comes at a devastating cost.

Detection and Identification

Chemical process hazard identification and prevention is a crucial aspect of chemical engineering that aims to ensure the safety of workers, communities, and the environment.

This process involves identifying potential hazards, assessing their risks, and implementing measures to prevent or mitigate them. Hazard identification can be achieved through various methods such as process hazard analysis, safety audits, and incident investigations. Once hazards have been identified, risk assessment tools such as hazard and operability (HAZOP) studies, failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), and fault tree analysis (FTA) can be used to evaluate the severity of the risks and prioritize preventive measures. Prevention measures can include engineering controls such as safety interlocks and pressure relief devices, administrative controls such as operating procedures and training, and personal protective equipment (PPE). Effective hazard identification and prevention require a comprehensive and systematic approach, and continuous improvement to ensure the safety of chemical processes.

At Angiras Rasayan, we understand the importance of process safety and the potential hazards that come with chemical processing. Here is a comparative table highlighting the key differences between LOPA (Layer of Protection Analysis) and HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study):
Aspect HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study) LOPA (Layer of Protection Analysis)
Purpose Identify potential hazards and operability issues systematically Evaluate the adequacy of existing protection layers for specific hazards
Type of Analysis Qualitative (can be semi-quantitative) Semi-quantitative to quantitative
Focus Process deviations, causes, consequences Risk assessment of specific hazard scenarios
Output List of deviations, causes, consequences, safeguards, and recommendations Risk ranking, need for additional protection layers, and SIL targets
Inputs Required P&IDs, process knowledge, operating procedures Specific scenarios (often from HAZOP), frequencies, IPL effectiveness
Facilitation Typically facilitated by a multidisciplinary team Often facilitated by safety or risk analyst with team input
Use of Scenarios Broad exploration of what can go wrong Focused evaluation of selected scenarios
Detail Level High-level brainstorming of process issues Detailed risk quantification of specific events
Risk Evaluation Based on team judgment Uses numerical estimates (e.g., frequency, probability, risk matrix)
Standards Referenced IEC 61882, OSHA 1910.119 IEC 61511, CCPS LOPA Guidelines
Typical Outcome List of required actions, design changes, or safeguards Decision on whether existing layers are sufficient or more needed
When Used Early in design or during major modifications After HAZOP to assess the risk of critical scenarios
Tool Dependency Checklist- and guideword-based Risk matrix, consequence severity, IPL credit calculations

Angiras Rasayan

Chemical innovation, sustainability and expertise.
Comprehensive process design and integration with energy efficient safety solutions. Unlock your chemical business' full potential.
Let's achieve your vision together.

Copyright © Angiras Rasayan LLP 2025